Year C — The Second Sunday after the Epiphany

Commentary for January 20, 2013
by the Rev. Dr. John Fairless

Click here for today’s readings
Listen to this week’s podcast (click here)

Isaiah 62:1-5
Okay, I pretty much love any scripture passage that manages to work in the word “diadem.” I am immediately transported back to my home church as a child, falling with sacred throngs and ascribing majesty and such to the Lord. (“All Hail the Power of Jesus’ Name,” one of my top ten favorite hymn texts!)

The primary images in Isaiah’s language, however, are of marriage; notice the “good news” in vv. 4-5: God’s people will no longer be “Forsaken” or “Desolate” (images here of the unmarried or barren woman) but will be called “My Delight is in Her” and “Married.” 

Sexist in this day and time? Maybe. Just take a stroll through the magazine shelves in Barnes and Noble or Books-A-Million and count the number of glossy-covered tomes devoted to brides, weddings, and such. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

No doubt this passage serves as deep background for the gospel text and Jesus’ first miracle at the wedding feast in Cana. 

Psalm 36:5-10
Feasting, drinking, celebrating love. Also a great companion piece for the gospel text. 

Verse 6 interests me: God saves animals and humans alike. I suppose all dogs really do go to heaven?

1 Corinthians 12:1-11
Nice touch to have the New Testament’s pre-eminent passage on “gifts” sandwiched in between all these verses about love and marriage!

The “spirituals” here in v.1 come from the wind, the breath — hence, Spirit — of God.  The root word, pneumatikos, can be translated “not human” or “not natural” — which makes a nice contrast to verse 2 concerning the way we acted when we were “pagan,” or very much natural.

God’s working in our lives goes far beyond what we can do on our own — naturally. 

John 2:1-11
Coming on the heels of the Epiphany and Baptism, we have here a further “revealing” of who Jesus is. This, as John tells us, is the first of Jesus’ “signs,” or miracles. Those present get a glimpse of his true nature — which, one might well assume, his mother had viewed for quite a few years.

I’ve always loved the interplay between Mary — a good Jewish mother, no doubt — and her eldest son, who is somewhat reluctant to be placed on display. “Just do whatever he tells you to do,” she says to the servants. She knows her boy — he will do what is best.

Interesting that, early on in John’s gospel, we hear that “his disciples believed him.” We might well ask, “Oh, really? Then why do they continue to struggle to understand him for 19 more chapters?”

Maybe it’s because believing doesn’t necessarily require understanding, at least not completely. 

by the Rev. Dr. Delmer L. Chilton

Some years ago I heard a story about an Italian trying to start a vineyard in northeast Georgia, near the town of Helen.The County Commissioners were a group of good southern, evangelical Christians, and at that time, the county was “dry” like most of the rest of rural Georgia, and the leaders were none too keen on granting a permit for a wine making business.
The man was very confused by their attitude. Most of all, he could not understand how making wine could be considered un-Christian.“After all,” he said, “did not our Lord turn water into wine at the wedding at Cana in Galilee?”
Wall, that remark sure got them stirred up. Every good southern evangelical was very clear on the reality that though Jesus may have turned the water into what they CALLED wine, it was not wine as we know it; it was grape juice, unfermented,, non-alcoholic; the recipe for which was lost from Biblical times until the 1800s; when a dentist and Methodist communion steward named Welch rediscovered it.
(That’s a little bit true; Welch’s grape juice was originally created as non-alcoholic communion wine. The whole jams and jellies thing came later.)
Anyway, the Italian Catholic vintner stood there in amazement as the folks argued amongst themselves until the chair used his gavel and called for order and said, Well, I have researched this thing and I have to say there was no such thing as unfermented grape juice in bible times. They didn’t have the technology for it. Jesus really did turn the water into wine. . . .and I have to say that I’ve always been a little disappointed in the Lord for that!”
The story of turning water into wine at a wedding is very well known, and it has been used for a number of purposes. It is cited in the Lutheran wedding service for example; as a way, I suppose, of saying that Jesus endorses marriage;or perhaps that Jesus endorses drinking a bit and partying after a wedding. Along those lines, I’ve heard it cited on both sides of the drink/don’t drink argument.
As a miracle, of sign as John prefers to say, it’s not like a healing, or a Transfiguration, or a raising from the dead, or a feeding of the 5000, or even a stilling of the storm or a walking on the water. It doesn’t come with any easily discernible, easily preachable, easily applicable meaning. It’s just this extraordinary thing that Jesus did. It makes one feel more like saying, “Party on, Dude;” than “Amen Brother!”
So, knowing that John included this story in his gospel for a reason, we must ask the question – What are we expected to learn from this story?”If the fact that Jesus could turn water into wine is not the real point, then what is?
John is a writer whose work is full of symbolism.Unlike the other Gospel writers; Matthew, Mark and Luke; he makes no pretence that his is a straight forward, historical narrative of the life and ministry of Jesus.John’s intent is to reveal to us spiritual truth through the use of human stories.
Reading John is something like watching the TV show “Lost”.Things are always different from how they seem and this means it’s generally a bit tricky to figure out what John is getting at. 
A prevailing theme throughout John’s gospel is the dawning of a new age. To John, the coming of Jesus as the Messiah has changed the world from what it used to be into something totally new and different.
This is why John prefers to use the word “signs” instead of the word “miracles.” These things that Jesus did, like turning water into wine, were signs to the faithful that the new age of God’s dealing with the world had come.
So – what Jesus did was not about an obedient son reluctantly doing what his mother asked; nor was it about Jesus making sure the host of the wedding was not embarrassed by the wine running out,nor was it about making sure those attending the party were able to keep drinking.
What is really significant in this story is that the water is special water. It is water that has been set aside for the Jewish purification rites.It is there for the people to wash up in. This washing was not about being sanitary or comfortable.This washing was a religious ceremony; it was a ritual cleansing in order to go before the Lord during the wedding feast.In this sign – Jesus takes the old- the ritual bath water;and turns it into the new- fresh wine.
It is important to realize that Jesus did not take the bad and turn it into the good! He did not take the useless and turn it into the useful.He took good things from the past and transformed them, changed them, into other good things for the future.
A good question for us today is “what does this text say to us?” today, in this place, in the year 2013.What is our water that Jesus has come to turn into wine?
The new age brought by Jesus the Christ is an ongoing age of transformation and growth.
We are not the people we once were;nor are we the people we will someday become.
We are in a state of fluidity; we are water being changed into wine.
We have choices, as individuals and as communities of faith.We can face the future’s changes with fear and resistance;or, we can embrace them with faith and excitement.
Either way, change is going to happen, the new age is upon us, the water is beginning to change, and God is smack dab in the middle of it. 

 Amen and amen.

4 thoughts on “Year C — The Second Sunday after the Epiphany

  1. oooh, I really like that. Change is such a hard issue in the church yet here it is. Thanks, Jesus and Delmer, for getting me to see that. And thanks, John, for getting the royal diadem stuck in my head.

  2. Love the connection to change in the church, certainly will preach! Thanks again and GO RAVENS on Sunday evening, and also Peyton was awesome last Sunday, he could still get mvp or at least be comeback kid of the year. – Lisa

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s